Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Bill Jackson who wrote (85828)	1/7/2000 3:51:00 PM
From: Elmer	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1572621

Yes Bill, we've all read that one and reading it again still doesn't show any claim by GTW that Intel failed to meet it's commitments. Only that GTW wanted more parts than Intel could deliver. You can keep posting that one all day and it's not going to change. In addition you claimed even Intel admitted [it failed to meet it's commitments]. Where did you see that? EP

To: Bill Jackson who wrote (85828)	1/7/2000 4:02:00 PM
From: steve harris	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1572621

Bill, don't you get it? The copper contamination at Dresden caused Intel to SCREW Gateway. What's so hard to understand about that? Elmer is repeating Paul's theory from last night. Just because it tastes better to their congregation, doesn't mean we have to swallow it. If Paul is repeating something his buddies at Intel has told him concerning Gateway's business, then he may be guilty of divulging confidential information. Message 12493064 "We never knew what we were going to get, when we were going to get it, so we never had a coherent marketing strategy," Todd said. Intel blew it. Period. steve