SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Cirruslvr who wrote (85948)1/7/2000 11:56:00 PM
From: Charles R  Respond to of 1572033
 
<We believe that AMD could report significant upside in 4Q99 in terms of
revenue and EPS. The company could report revenues significantly above $850 million
(vs our $800 million estimate) and EPS north of $0.10 for 4Q99. We
believe AMD experienced solid unit demand for its Athlon processors paired
with healthy ASPs. Strong flash memory demand should also contribute
meaningfully in 4Q99, though we would be cautious of potential inventory build
of low-density flash memory in the supply chain that could be flushed out in
1Q00. The significance of the Gateway pre-announcement to AMD is that it
should help AMD to begin to penetrate the corporate market. It has been
anticipated for approximately a month that major PC-OEMs, including Gateway,
would begin to shift some business AMD's way.>

Nowadays a lot of analysts say something in the report and do something else when it comes to the final numbers. Mosesmann seems to be with this group. How can one have an estimate of $800M and in the same sentense say that the sales will be significantly over $850? Go figure.



To: Cirruslvr who wrote (85948)1/8/2000 3:05:00 AM
From: Process Boy  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1572033
 
cirrus - re: Prudential Report

The processors in question are not on its newer
0.18 micron Coppermine technology, so we would doubt that yield-related issues here are at fault.


So do I pretty much totally discount that yields have anything to do with this) and that is what is so perplexing about this story!!!

I sure hope Intel talks about it next week. I'm genuinely curious.

PB