Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Lucent Technologies (LU) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Dana Adams who wrote (12420)	1/7/2000 10:27:00 PM
From: Luis	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 21876

hey dana buy csco sacrifice the pig,its hard but i did it with cpq at 38 in april and bought 200 more of csco ,look at cpq today and csco today .kill lucent the pig .good luck

To: Dana Adams who wrote (12420)	1/7/2000 10:46:00 PM
From: The Phoenix	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 21876

Dana, What is your problem. I'm paging through the posts here and all I see is you telling everyone else they don't know what they're talking about. You even went after Chuzz who happens to be incredibly knowledgable. At the same time you say "hang on to your hats fellas".... the same thing you said when good ol LU was at 73-74. At least Chuzz was discussing serious issues back then... Still Chuzz was honest enough to own up to the fact that he didn't call this while many were giving him credit. So, what has made you such a bitter old woman? Perhaps you could share with us why you think LU will rocket from here. Give us some real insight here lady... stop bashing and tells us why we "should hold on to our hats". OG

To: Dana Adams who wrote (12420)	1/7/2000 10:55:00 PM
From: bgg	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 21876

Well Dana, regardless who says it, these concerns are valid. You apparently don't understand. So does this mean that anyone who posts comments on this thread and doesn't use their real name doesn't deserve respect? Careful, you're talking about most of the posters on this board. I posted the information as discussion fodder for LU's recent announcement. You apparently respond to posts that take a contrairian view of "long LU" by insulting people (meager earnings, weak kneed jerks..). Of course, no commentary on why these points (especially transition issues) shouldn't be longer term concerns. I typically expect better and smarter behavior from my elders. I could care less if you prosper, although in your case you better make every year count.