Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Michael who wrote (60867)	1/7/2000 11:15:00 PM
From: Cooters	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 152472

Michael, Which order-taker do you use? Cooters

To: Michael who wrote (60867)	1/7/2000 11:22:00 PM
From: jazzcat2000	Respond to of 152472

Michael, I agree with you in one sense. My partner placed an order for 200 shares of Qcom and his M/L guy tried to cut him back to 100 shares. The price...$190 per share. On the other hand, their telecon analyst Michael Chinn has been very supportive of Q, at least over the last several months.

To: Michael who wrote (60867)	1/8/2000 7:39:00 AM
From: Magic212	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 152472

Merril Lynch has always been anti-Q. My mom's broker is ML Michael, That's a pretty sweeping generalization. My PM @ Merrill talked to me more than once about buying QCOM when it was below 100. Did I listen to him? No. Do I wish I did? Yep. Didn't get in 'til much later. And by the way, he personally owns gobs of Q, as do his partners over there. So maybe it's just your Mom's broker that is anti Q and not ML as a whole. -Leslie btw, so now when he's talking JDSU - I am listening :-) Though it was this thread that brought it to my attention first.