SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Techride -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Susan G who wrote (6848)1/10/2000 2:16:00 AM
From: KLP  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 7442
 
Hi Everyone~~Time to wake up! :D Looks like everyone had a nice rest this week after the hectic week last week....found something that might make you laugh....it's the early frog that catches the right stock....
909's and then some more! KLP

ladyoh.tripod.com



To: Susan G who wrote (6848)1/11/2000 1:19:00 AM
From: Joana Tides  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 7442
 
Hi Susan, just been reading all the controversy around xicgex with interest - a Quack 'n Buy Op likely. Yeah look who's nipping at its heels to hasten bringing it down ... gotta give shorters of such a stock at such a time a medal (rather not say for what). So now it's talk about a big premium valuation difference with xcmgix, "Seems Like Yesterday" that one went thru this same thing (or WAS it yesterday?!) and looky now, the market has a short memory!
Text search gives some interesting finds ... like this #reply-12529464 Never Even Heard of most of these tickers but seems as though they've done well and gotta admire Jack's DD. Notice some Techride pets dropped from the running for one or another reason, but IMHO he's wrong to discount 'em using a pure numbers basis - which of course would work as well as any discipline/strategy of analysis. But the charisma imponderable or the synergy or the design build-up powering so many rises of dotcoms is missing from those numbers.
909s,
Joan