Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Cisco Systems, Inc. (CSCO) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Zoltan! who wrote (31168)	1/8/2000 7:31:00 PM
From: Paul Reuben	Respond to of 77400

Check this out: Message 12511230

To: Zoltan! who wrote (31168)	1/8/2000 7:56:00 PM
From: Brian Malloy	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 77400

Cramer on the LU...Greenberg & Battipaglia debate. Message 12511230 Just noted that I reposted what Paul had already put up. Well, I guess it is worth reading twice <ggg>.

To: Zoltan! who wrote (31168)	1/9/2000 9:24:00 AM
From: Techplayer	Respond to of 77400

Zoltan, I still find it hard to believe that people pay for commentary like Greenberg's. The guy is obviously a crook. Btw, even if LU fails to hit present, reduced expectations and only does $1.4/share this year, how does that justify high 30's in "the long term"? Can he say in this market that LU should be trading at less than the multiple of next year's numbers for the ENTIRE market? People need to use their heads. For the record, I do plan on selling 50% of my position in the near term. Battipaglia happens to be one of the very few analysts on Wall Street that seems to be honest and have a clue. If he says that LU is in the dumper for the long term, then it is time to sell, imo. Oh, and Greenberg is a clown if you missed that part <g>. Brian