Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Biotech / Medical : ADVA -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: EtTuBrute who wrote (206)	1/9/2000 12:21:00 AM
From: Sportfish	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 242

EtTu - I was referring to the "consent" he mentioned in Golden Lists post #19286. (My AOL doesn't seem to link). I took it to refer to Loomco, when it most prob. referred to approval of name change & other proposals from FreeEdgar. Sorry re that. I like your analysis. I was thinking the NASDAQ angle, too. (CBQI just announced). Easier from $3 than $.30. Like the majority shareholder angle, too. ADVA isn't doing this all for ADVA, that's for sure. I think this could be a major improvement! Thanx. Sportfish

To: EtTuBrute who wrote (206)	1/9/2000 1:06:00 AM
From: Jim Bishop	Respond to of 242

Can I ask you guys a favor if anyone has the time? Take a look at IMCC filing and tell me what you think. It's a weird one. Took a momo little ride when we put it out, but that was after 100%+ gain previous to us finding it. My take is, when all is said and done, it ends up being a reporting shell, owned by a pretty big company, and I don't think, they'd just let it waste away, but I may be missing something. Longs on RB seem to be just a buncha pissed off dudes, and don't answer much......LOL but here's a great line from one guy: "if the stock price skyrockets to multiple dollars, IMC will have a hard time convincing anyone that the stock isn't worth anything."