SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: steve harris who wrote (86074)1/9/2000 2:47:00 PM
From: tejek  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1573678
 
do you think AMD will repeat it's past or is it different this time?

steve, I have no more knowledge of what AMD will do than PB, and maybe less since I didn't know that AMD even existed until 1999.

But I will tell you what my gut tells me after listening to all the arguments re Sanders. First I think with the K5/6 either Sanders got bad info re them, or he wanted to believe that AMD could use them to pull off a coup....in some way he got sucked into supporting those chips. I say that because it is clear to me that after the Athlon, Sanders knows how to execute well. AMD has pretty much done all the right things for the past 8 mos and that is why, to a degree, Intel is flailing about right now. Sanders seems to have vision, talent and an ability to lead.

As far as I can tell, Sanders Achilles heel (aside from his alleged fascination with Hollywood which truly belies his intelligence) is $ management. His margins have always sucked and in turn AMD's profits....part of that can be attributed to the competition with Intel but I believe most of it is him.

So do I think AMD will repeat its past....I don't know but if you want to get a clue, then check out the financials for Q4. They should provide some insights as to whether reform at least financially is truly happening at AMD. At least that's what I believe.

ted