Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Manhattan Minerals (MAN.T) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TheBusDriver who wrote (3912)	1/10/2000 11:42:00 AM
From: Sailfish	Respond to of 4504

Hi to all.. In the news... Manhattan Minerals Corp MAN Shares issued 25,821,343 2000-01-07 close $5.2 Monday Jan 10 2000 Robert Bishop, writing in his Fax-Alert No. 153 (Dec. 20), says there should be no shortage of news from Manhattan's Tambo Grande project in the next month. Mr. Bishop recommended the stock in March, 1998, at $3, and again in June, 1999, at $3.85. It was $4.50 at the time of his current report. Mr. Bishop says the company's activities at Tambo Grande include two drills working to expand the oxide gold deposit that overlies TG1, two more at work on the underlying sulphide deposit, and one drill exploring outlying targets. In addition to drilling results, metallurgical news should be out in late January. Further, six major firms are scheduled to visit the project. The editor of Gold Mining Stock Report says Manhattan should benefit greatly from the passage of the tax-loss season. Mr. Bishop cautions, however, that Manhattan's shares have moved from institutional to more nervous retail hands. He calls Manhattan an "obvious takeover target."

To: TheBusDriver who wrote (3912)	1/10/2000 11:53:00 AM
From: Sailfish	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 4504

>>Not to be rude but I don't intend on doing your homework for you. << Thank you for your kind offer...You might then indicate the sincerity of same by being so kind as to allow individuals the courtesy of expressing concerns about the project without directly or indirectly bullying them regarding their posts, regardless of the fact whether or not the issues were the subject of any previous discussion... Personally, I prefer to read all correspondence from posters...The solution to your dilemma would appear quite simple; just hit the "next message" key... This type of censorship sucks... Regards....Ray