SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Burt Masnick who wrote (95578)1/10/2000 5:04:00 PM
From: Joey Smith  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 186894
 
Burt, re:His prediction for the future batting average is very suspect.

Agreed. It wasn't too long ago he was on CNBC telling the world to sell INTC when it was trading around $50. The stock never stayed there very long. Now, he's telling people INTC is going to $100. It's all become a numbers game (e.g. Qualcomm target of $1000!) Personally, I try to see if there is any "substance" or analysis behind the numbers. It's pretty easy to tell if an analyst has an agenda if he/she focuses only on the "-" and ignores the "+" (or vice-versa).
joey



To: Burt Masnick who wrote (95578)1/10/2000 6:48:00 PM
From: Craig M. Newmark  Respond to of 186894
 
Burt,

Re: "Though, come to think of it, Elaine Garzirelli got a poor rep after correctly calling the Oct 1987 crash and then almost nothing else correctly. And I think Gail Dudack just got chucked from the Wall Street Week group of elves for being so consistently wrong."

And remember how quickly Joe Granville became yesterday's news.

Craig


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News