Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Biotech / Medical : GZTC -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Don England who wrote (648)	1/10/2000 5:43:00 PM
From: Skeeter Bug	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 752

don, i'm more than happy to be wrong on gztc. i've just seen so many stocks dive after more dilution. it is times like this that i realize why i hold those dive bombers... you just never know... hope we see $20+ soon. gztc has a lot of potential.

To: Don England who wrote (648)	1/11/2000 5:23:00 AM
From: Gator II	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 752

Don, are you sure you want to place a "stop loss" on a Nasdaq stock, especially one as volatile as GZTC. IMO, like clockwork, the MM's drop the price to scoop up the stop losses just before upward surges and when the price drops sharply, most often a "stop loss limit order" isn't executed and a regular stop loss user is massacred when the order is triggered and converted to a "market order." As for the pre-surge drop to scoop up stop loss orders that had most likely been placed, witness GZTC's market action last week. FWIW, my experience and observation is that using "stop loss" orders on Nasdaq stocks is almost like handing a gift (or at least a target) to the market makers. Just a thought. No offense, but personally, I would use puts as insurance to safeguard a gain rather than place a stop loss. Regards and good luck, Gator II