Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Altaba Inc. (formerly Yahoo) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TARADO96 who wrote (25116)	1/10/2000 11:09:00 PM
From: Electric	Respond to of 27307

Not to intrude, but you are right. They can do as QCOM did, also as PFE did, make it upon approval of shareholder vote. My gut tells me 3 for 1, but if the managment was smart (like I think QCOM's was) they would realize that if they do a 4 for 1 it will be beneficial for shareholders. 2 for 1 is as likely as 4 for 1 unfortunately.. Good luck to all, me included...

To: TARADO96 who wrote (25116)	1/11/2000 12:28:00 AM
From: Martin Atogho	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 27307

Qcom already had shares authorised. They still have enough to be able to do a 3-1 split. Shareholder thing was as is standard. Now this worries me that they do not yet have the shares authorised. Has this happened before (even if with another companty)?