SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Rambus (RMBS) - Eagle or Penguin -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Glenda King who wrote (36415)1/10/2000 11:54:00 PM
From: Don Green  Respond to of 93625
 
Samsung delivers Rambus
January 10, 2000 - 1:05pm, Mark Stubblefield

Samsung Electronics has become the first company to complete development of a 288Mb Direct Rambus DRAM (RDRAM) component and 576MB rambus in-line Memory Module (RIMM Module).

Today Samsung announced that they are the first company to complete development of a Rambus memory module that will feature a design rule of 0.17-micron (very fast!) applied for processing the circuits for the very highly integrated 288Mb device. With twice the capacity of the high-speed 144Mb version this is a very swift technology advancement. The data processing speed at each pin has been improved to 800Mb per second.

Basically this new RAM technology is very, very fast. For example, it can process the equivalent of 6,550 newspaper pages of information per second. The worldwide RDRAM market is expected to make up at least 10-percent of the DRAM market, totaling an estimated US$3billion this year, and this portion is forecast to increase to a 50-percent share in 2002. So you can expect to see Rambus used widespread later on this year and start to become a standard in a few years.



To: Glenda King who wrote (36415)1/11/2000 12:03:00 AM
From: richard surckla  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 93625
 
Glenda... Thank you! Good to see your son knows how to "tune a fiddle." <VBG>



To: Glenda King who wrote (36415)1/11/2000 4:19:00 AM
From: Ian Anderson  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 93625
 
As a computer designer I would say that whoever wrote that did *not* know what they are talking about. They know the jargon, but have arranged it in a meaningless mismash.

Advice: Disregard