Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Ask Michael Burke -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Diamond Jim who wrote (73240)	1/11/2000 3:43:00 PM
From: Cynic 2005	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 132070

<<I am up 125%.>> GFY! <<I have never been much into peer pressure or cults, explain the philosophy to me.>> Oh yea? Since when you left the church of Intel and Bob Brinker cult? Now that I recognize who you are, I am regretting even initiating a dialogue with you. My mistake. Thank you for not posting to me again.

To: Diamond Jim who wrote (73240)	1/11/2000 5:37:00 PM
From: Earlie	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 132070

Jim: I don't hate Intel, I just think the stock price and multiple is off the graph. Normally a stock provided a growth multiple sags badly when the growth disappears. INTC's numbers of the last several quarters have done just that,....sagged. As a result of its "darling" status, the stock price has ignored the stagnant reality, at least for now. Like most bears, I've learned to be both patient and disciplined, so I'll just put away a few (so far) deep-out-of-the-money puts on this mad romp with the adoring analysts and wait. By the way, for some bears, 1999 was an excellent year. (g) Best, Earlie