Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Churchill (CUQ), PE of 3! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: speculatingvalue who wrote (181)	1/11/2000 11:54:00 PM
From: Gulo	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 264

>I don't think people realize how ridiculously small the market cap is. No kidding. If this company wasn't in a cyclic industry, I would just keep buying more. As it is, it forms almost 20% of my portfolio. I think this is a good long term (i.e., 2 years+) hold. I just don't expect it to go anywhere very quickly. This is not a company that would appeal to most short term investors, so I don't see how the company can generate a great deal of excitement. As awareness build, it may start to creep up to $2.00 or so. People don't seem to care much about earnings nowadays; they just want to know what others will be willing to pay for a stock. In fact, if a company has earnings, it must be well established and therefor boring. It seems like the stock market has become like the Pokeman card market. As I said before, I'm just willing to let the company earn me money. As long as the insiders don't get too greedy, I'm content to let it accumulate earnings at 15-25% per year. Of course, the outlook won't stay rosy forever, as the building boom will eventually end again. I think it's good for a couple of years yet. The main reason I'm in this stock is that it is a relatively 'conservative' speculation, balancing the high risk ventures that form the rest of my portfolio. -g