Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Strategy for Achieving Wealth and Off Topic -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Yaacov who wrote (25204)	1/12/2000 10:26:00 AM
From: Sonny McWilliams	Respond to of 27012

Yaacov. I thought you were kidding. You do know the conversion of shares by now. Yes, 100 should be an easy target. I am sure you read this on the AOL board? Message 12545100 CNBC. Nah. Those guys have no shame. After all, MSN BC. gg. Msft is a bit behind the ball right now. Yahoo had great numbers. Yes, they are doing to Yahoo what they always do to AOL. Yahoo got an upgrade with a target price of 500. I guess one company still has this price target of 600. Paine Webber or PRU. Can't remember now. As a matter of fact. Faber does not get the story with WCOM either. WCOM would supposedly benefit from the merger of AOL and TWX. Why would they go with T when T will still be a competitor to TWX? And they DO need UUNET for the long distance part on the net. Wallstreet is rallying behind WCOM and calls it pretty cheap and FABER shows a chart and says: Something is going on here, the chart does not look too well. No kidding. Funny reporting is going on. Especially yesterday. They don't check the facts before they carry on about a company. WCOM's UUNET is an example. We can opine on things we are not too sure about but reporters should check more carefully before running off with the mouth. Ugh. AOL down again. I guess 50's here we come? NAZ turnaround to the downside. Sonny