Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Pacific Rim Mining V.PFG -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Quickdraw who wrote (12442)	1/12/2000 11:36:00 AM
From: m jensen	Respond to of 14627

Thanks again >g< Wouldn't that be dandy ;-(

To: Quickdraw who wrote (12442)	1/12/2000 2:50:00 PM
From: Nexus	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 14627

Qd and Mike, It is almost inconceivable that Barrick would hold on to it and expend that much money on it unless there was some information that we don't know about that would make Diablillos more attrative tahn we think. On the other hand, if it is not an economically viable project and Barrick gives it back to us, what would we do with it. It seems to me that if Barrick keeps Diablillos past the deadline, which is finally coming soon (less than 6 months), that it would confirm that Diablillos has a certain value and even though we only own 30% according to the present deal, PFG shareholders would be better off with Barrick in the picture. Any comments? It is a very confusing situation. Nexus.