Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Cents and Sensibility - Kimberly and Friends' Consortium -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Tassi who wrote (61333)	1/12/2000 1:40:00 PM
From: If only I'd held	Respond to of 108040

UTCC, alert....they are looking for stops at 15

To: Tassi who wrote (61333)	1/12/2000 1:47:00 PM
From: Bryan	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 108040

Obviously there is a problem if you think BIME was trading at "$400-$200 in 97-98." They reverse split the stock in 97 (1-10) and in 98 (1-10). That makes your $400 high a more realistic $4 right? I missed your question about why it's below $5...sorry. I did catch your remark about BIME---This company was $400-$200 in 97-98...What has happened to this one? ... Message 12549564 That is what I was commenting on. Why is it below $5? Many times a reverse split is the kiss-of-death for a stock. But I hope you do well with it. regards, B- not starting an argument