SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Network Appliance -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: dwayanu who wrote (2059)1/12/2000 3:03:00 PM
From: DownSouth  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 10934
 
Dway, I am not saying you are "wrong". I am saying that NTAP has higher barriers to entry than I can infer from your posts.

EMC will be affected by NTAP's discontinuous innovations.

EMC's roots are as a hardware manufacturer--not a software company.

Now they have a president that has been successful in running services companies (Unisys, Wang Global).

I think EMC's culture is going to be a substantial burden when the nimbler NTAP starts to eat away its "bottom".



To: dwayanu who wrote (2059)1/12/2000 6:41:00 PM
From: Uncle Frank  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 10934
 
>> Don't think CSCO's a fair comparison, it has an immensely wide and deep product line, and it's a little larger than NTAP.

The most important thing to recognize is that Cisco is a software company, Dway. Their Gorillahood is derived from a proprietary open standard called IOS. It is the networking sector's standard, and Cisco controls it.

I just hope Mr. V and company, who have reputedly adopted a Gorilla marketing approach, take a page from Cisco's book and license their software to the entire sector.

uf



To: dwayanu who wrote (2059)1/13/2000 4:02:00 AM
From: kas1  Respond to of 10934
 
Don't think CSCO's a fair comparison, it has an immensely wide and deep product line, and it's a little larger than NTAP.

But don't you see that that's the point? We study Cisco precisely because it has grown large; how has it done so? Your observation proves DS's contention about locking in on a product and growing quickly. Cisco at one point was as "small" as NTAP and had a product offering as "narrow."