SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech : Tulipomania Blowoff Contest: Why and When will it end? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Cheeky Kid who wrote (2527)1/12/2000 5:39:00 PM
From: re3  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 3543
 
good for him...has he checked yahoo today ?



To: Cheeky Kid who wrote (2527)1/12/2000 6:04:00 PM
From: bobby beara  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 3543
 
>>>>Last year this guy predicted a 70% chance of a world wide recession: <<<

ya, so what in 1929 irving fisher predicted a permanently high plateau.

the bears are wrong until they're right and the bulls are right until their wrong.

don't get so full of yourself like our buddy stuart and think you are on some crusade to defeat the y2k doomers and everybody else who doesn't buy this new paradigm crap.

hubris and overconfidence are in big supply at the top.



To: Cheeky Kid who wrote (2527)1/13/2000 12:09:00 AM
From: Hawkmoon  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 3543
 
I guess I "great minds" think alike... <VBG>

I agree with Yardeni's reading on the market. Despite his apparent miscall on global Y2K impacts, he has a terrific record as an economist. Besides, I had friends working in Koskinen's Y2K command center on New Year's eve, and to tell you the truth, THEY WERE WORRIED about overseas impacts, especially given the complete lack of government action in nations located in the pacific rim.

All of that money that sought shelter in the US assets last year now has little reason to remain here. The fact is that AG has to squeeze the Y2K excess from the markets NOW before he gets into the political season. Then we may actually see rate reductions. After all, these rate hikes are pre-emptive strikes against any potential inflation (as well as attempts to stifle the speculative fever in asset inflation).

Cheeky, despite your belief that all was going to be hunky dory over Y2K, there were plenty of people with far more information (or better stated, an inability to get straight answers from other nations) VERY worried about overseas Y2K repercussions. Very few of the so-called experts could say with any certainty that there would be no substantial impacts overseas (like Russia?). Everyone essentially "whistled past the graveyard" in Asia hoping they would muddle through.

And behold they did, which is a tribute to those engineers who built so much redundancy into our national infrastructure.

So don't be too hard on Yardeni. He had valid reasons for believing what he did. No one in positions of power or authority were able to provide him any reason NOT to believe there would be disruptions.

Regards,

Ron



To: Cheeky Kid who wrote (2527)1/13/2000 12:24:00 AM
From: bobby beara  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 3543
 
and while were at it cheeky weaky, don't pee on the tulip kids about y2k and lump us together, my only y2k prep was a ten pound bag of cat kibble for me and my feline friends -gg-, a bottle of dom perigon, and a couple of george washingtons to buy aspirin in the morning.

b



To: Cheeky Kid who wrote (2527)1/13/2000 6:42:00 AM
From: Oblomov  Respond to of 3543
 
Was he wrong? He didn't say 100%.