Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Hobie1Kenobe who wrote (61936)	1/12/2000 11:10:00 PM
From: JGoren	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 152472

Looks like mere repeat and not really another (independent) source.

To: Hobie1Kenobe who wrote (61936)	1/12/2000 11:12:00 PM
From: Kayaker	Respond to of 152472

Note also the change in Year Ending 09/2000 from .99 to 1.87 and Year Ending 09/2001 from 1.31 to 2.49, both changed from 4 weeks ago.

To: Hobie1Kenobe who wrote (61936)	1/12/2000 11:13:00 PM
From: R. Ramesh	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 152472

Here's another source for the 61 cent Q2 estimate. If it's accurate, the YE 9/2000 number seems too low. Perhaps we'll get a clarification tomorrow..... I think I know the problem with 0.61 for 03/00 quarter. Look at the high and low estimates in the clearstation link in 61938. THe high estimate is roughly 4 times the low one. Did we have a 4 to 1 split? Oh, yes, one (or few) of the estimates have not been adjusted for 4 to 1 split and hence this big discrepancy. Ramesh

To: Hobie1Kenobe who wrote (61936)	1/12/2000 11:15:00 PM
From: Lynn	Respond to of 152472

You are right. I noticed the same thing. It makes no sense how Q could be expected to make .61 for the 2nd quarter ending 3/'00 yet only $1.87 for the entire year. The .61 goes better with the estimate for the year ending 9/'01, $2.49. No, that .61 does not look right. Lynn