Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Winspear Resources -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: dgz who wrote (25217)	1/12/2000 11:39:00 PM
From: SwampDogg	Respond to of 26850

<<Makes you wonder if the stock will be trading at $2 when its earning $2 a share each and every year.>> SUF is getting pretty close

To: dgz who wrote (25217)	1/13/2000 12:22:00 AM
From: The Fix	Respond to of 26850

The real problem is NASDAQ! It's such a vacuum of investor cash. We are in the Grannies and Orphans phase, they want into tech's at any given cost. We all know what's behind the corner from here. Attitude is why should I wait a year or two for a double off of a blue Chip when I can spin the wheel on QQQ and double in six weeks. QQQ needs to correct big time and a healthy sector rotation needs to begin. We are seeing a somewhat of a sector rotation already into some commodities (Energy and Paper), Pharmacuticals and Financial. It's good to see the cash staying in equities instead of Bonds. Another sure sign is when every ex-VSE paper dump mining play turn themselves into a ".com" company and rolling back the shares. It just doesn't make sense when oil/gas co. are trading at 4X cash flow. fIXER

To: dgz who wrote (25217)	1/13/2000 4:28:00 AM
From: Berry Picker	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 26850

That will not happen .. it is a matter of just HOW under valued a stock can be.. most moves are hype,,hmmm None here.. and just why.. ==== EXACTLY.=== WHY? Do you have a pocket full of diamonds ..... No one here is in a hurry except the short players. Sit on it except you have a better play.

To: dgz who wrote (25217)	1/13/2000 10:51:00 AM
From: ddl	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 26850

imo, it's going to be tough a grind. I don't see the .coms slowing down for a few years. Deals and new tech announced this year, revenues next year, settlement the year after???.....yeeeek. Even if we found the source, it would be a non-event at this stage. I think Randy is on the right track, bringing this mine to operation by himself. Maybe after so large bulk processing and a few biggies, we'll attract a partner. Oh well, my shares are vaccum sealed, just to make sure they don't do bad on me :-)