Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : The New Qualcomm - a S&P500 company -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: engineer who wrote (5151)	1/13/2000 11:01:00 AM
From: Wyätt Gwyön	Respond to of 13582

Do you know about the reception quality of the Samsung SCH-3500 compared to the Qualcomm phones? I have had a lot of dropped calls here in Austin--don't know if that is due to the phone or Sprint's porous network here. I keep the analog mode turned off since I do not want to pay roaming. I had a lot less trouble with a Nokia 6160 on ATT Wireless locally (but maybe it was using analog--LOL!). I tend to think the Sprint network sucks here in Austin.

To: engineer who wrote (5151)	1/13/2000 3:46:00 PM
From: marginmike	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 13582

Can you get any carrier in a benz, just got the S and need to put phone in it, can I just put my portable with kit?

To: engineer who wrote (5151)	1/13/2000 10:25:00 PM
From: voop	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 13582

My Samsung voice activated clam shell is also screwing up with poor quality judged by people whom I talk to you and you can not call in. Sprint says "its the network, not the phone." They are sold out of that model and are going to take 48 hrs to test the network. FWIW, the local New Orlenas suburbs's store has no Samsung, little thin phones, no accessories for either but all the Nokias and Startac's you want. All employees have thin phones on their belts. Voop