SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical : VISX -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Robert G. Harrell who wrote (1474)1/13/2000 11:41:00 AM
From: Mikeh  Respond to of 1754
 
I think that's what's killing the stock - the sense that there's a long wait before knowing anything. There's too many richer pastures out there in today's market for that kind of patience.



To: Robert G. Harrell who wrote (1474)1/13/2000 1:02:00 PM
From: MGV  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1754
 
The stock is down today on a Blair (investment bank) report that procedure growth will be 10% (Goldman Sachs thinks 11-12%, some others as high as 20%).

The recovery time for this stock has not changed. There are several possible catalysts. Earnings is NOT one of them. One is official release of the PTO reexamination of the '388 patent. Two is a license agreement with Lasersight and Bausch & Lomb. B&L likely has no interest in reaching agreement at least until it obtains FDA approval to market its Technolas laser in the U.S.

One significant data point that has been lost on the market was the announcement of the deal with the Canadian center, Lasik Vision. In my view, the deal to buy 100 laser systems and to continue to pay $250 procedure royalties speaks volumes regarding VISX's competitive advantages if not its patent portfolio strength. Lasik Vision previously used B&L laser systems in Canada. Moreover, the deal flies in the face of Murphy's main contention: that an erosion in the market price of the procedure leads to an imminent erosion in the royalty amount. Here is Lasik Vision, a corporate center trumpeting the lowest prices in the industry buying 100 lasers and agreeing to pay the going royalty rate!

The wait may not be as long as you anticipate. Unfortunately both expected catalysts are time dependent on government agencies (FDA and PTO). Therefore, the length of the waiting time is not easily forecasted.



To: Robert G. Harrell who wrote (1474)1/13/2000 11:30:00 PM
From: Lisa A. Grabenbauer  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1754
 
I respect Murphy's opinion on most issues, but I think his argument here may be flawed. Affordable prices will, in fact, stimulate surgical procedures which should increase equipment demand.