SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Voltaire who wrote (62136)1/13/2000 6:00:00 PM
From: im a survivor  Respond to of 152472
 
<<About $155. Then we go boom to earnings.
>>

Guess I better buy back those 150's, huh ? Wonder if I should wait and buy them back at last minute, or go ahead and buy them back sooner....whaddya think ?

I've also been buying some qcom 2001 160's and 2002 150's-200's. Also been picking up some aol 2001 60's and 2002 80's- 100's



To: Voltaire who wrote (62136)1/13/2000 6:59:00 PM
From: Jeffry K. Smith  Respond to of 152472
 
V - thank you sir. I hope you're right. <eom>



To: Voltaire who wrote (62136)1/13/2000 7:24:00 PM
From: limtex  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 152472
 
Vol -

Remember just before the announcement of the sale of the handset division. We all knew it would send the stock higher and we knew the time for the announcement was to be before the end of the month and yet only a day or so before the actual announcement it was just stuck down.

Seems to me that we've got the same syndrome again. The market wants to see the white of their eyes before buying and IMHO these earnings are going to put something quite nice and big and good in fornt of their eyes.

Remember our absent friends last post or two. He referred to the last quarter as being 'very interesting'

I think it might be worth reminding everyone that there are some quite interesting sales stats about the December quarter in the mobile phone business, namely that, I think more phones are sold in that quarter than any other.

Best regards,

L