SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (86963)1/13/2000 6:40:00 PM
From: Charles R  Read Replies (5) | Respond to of 1572537
 
Tenchusatsu,

<Face it, Chuck. You were wrong, big time>

Cleraly you do not understand what I am saying. Otherwise you would not be saying this. Here are clips from Intel press release.

"** Interest and other was $508 million in the fourth quarter, higher than previous guidance of $280 million, due to higher than expected gains on sales of equity investments."

This is HUGE discrepancy.

Also from the press release:

"INTEL CORPORATION
SUPPLEMENTAL FINANCIAL AND OTHER INFORMATION

(In millions)
Q4 '99 Q3 '99 YTD 1999 Q4 '98 YTD 1998
OPERATING SEGMENT INFORMATION:
Intel Architecture Business Group
Revenues 6,955 6,331 25,274 6,965 23,853
Operating Profit 3,318 2,789 11,356 3,318 9,413 "

This indicates flat to slightly negative growth in the core Microprocessor business. Do you understand what this means?

Finally, one thing that slid by was that apparently this quarter had 14 weeks compared to the typical 13 weeks in a quarter. That means possibly one full week of extra revenues compared to normal.

<On the other hand, that doesn't mean you have to suffer. >

No, I won't! I already know that Intel's halo keeps the stock price up even in face of the data like the stuff I presented above.

<I'm sure AMD will do just as well as INTC, if not better, next week.>

As I have been saying on this thread AMD will do a lot better than Intel this Q.

Chuck