Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : TSIG.com TIGI (formerly TSIG) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Roy F. Baker who wrote (37677)	1/13/2000 6:28:00 PM
From: ztect	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 44908

insightful...poignant analysis...... LOL...... why bother? z btw....when, if ever, will pnlk mention how many members they have????

To: Roy F. Baker who wrote (37677)	1/13/2000 11:51:00 PM
From: Suzanne Newsome	Read Replies (5) \| Respond to of 44908

Roy, Several months ago I posted gross profit projections for several of the deals that had been announced by the company. I clearly identified the posts as "projections" implying prediction of a future event. I clearly labeled my assumptions, and demonstrated how the results were calculated. I invited everybody on the thread to rebut my posts. I have a list somewhere of all the posts/posters who challenged my work at the time. Oh, here it is: 1. Months passed. Even the dimmest were able to conclude the projections were wrong. Some tried to make a big deal about the fact that the projections were wrong. Nobody publicly posted any challenge to my projection posts at the time they were originally made. I have admitted in public the projections were wrong. If somebody has missed the point here, let me make it clear: my projections were wrong. In my defense, there was no past history to base an analysis on. I was woefully short of real information. The business model is a new concept with few examples to study. Gordon at the time was making some (in retrospect) incredibly favorable projections himself. I was na‹ve in making the posts. Note: "na‹ve," not evil, not manipulative, not dishonest. It's no damn wonder nobody reads this thread any more if this is indicative of the issues being discussed here. Regards, Suzanne