SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Ask Michael Burke -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Lucretius who wrote (73516)1/13/2000 9:05:00 PM
From: Skeeter Bug  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 132070
 
uh, uncle al, what did you expect all that financial liquidity crack you shot into the market to do? -ng-

agreed that my tbill analysis is of little interest. nobody responded to it w/ any analysis of their own on the qcom thread. i mean, what is $50b between friends? ;-)



To: Lucretius who wrote (73516)1/13/2000 9:09:00 PM
From: MythMan  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 132070
 
>>Greenspan said there was no sign of inflation pressures<<

I think he should just stfu....



To: Lucretius who wrote (73516)1/13/2000 9:31:00 PM
From: Earlie  Respond to of 132070
 
Luc:

The journalist would have been more accurate if he had changed the last sentence to read,..."aimed at keeping the wall of treasuries, currently under selling pressure, from inundating the U.S. economy." That is the real reason for the rate increase impetus. (g)

Best, Earlie


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News