SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Ask Michael Burke -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Fred Fahmy who wrote (73554)1/13/2000 11:56:00 PM
From: Skeeter Bug  Respond to of 132070
 
fred... and he ain't divine... ;-)

if 63 cents was the estimate... and the estimate incl charges... and intel earned 61 cents after charges... intel blows away estimates...

only when alan g is flooding the credit markets w/ cash ;-)

seriously, though, the opportunity cost of a risky $700b in eps over the next 20 years is over $1t GUARANTEED. nearly a 50% increase in return on investment.

why say no to a 50% increase in roi? after all, investing in acompany is all about what that company can earn, right? ;-)



To: Fred Fahmy who wrote (73554)1/14/2000 2:35:00 AM
From: Knighty Tin  Respond to of 132070
 
Fred, Niles also has the capability to ignore the hedge fund sales that added to eps and helped Intel barely miss the whisper number. What a tempest in a teapot this eps report was. I thought they would try to fake 70 cents the way the stock moved, and here they missed the estimate and the whisper after backing out the hedge fund, er, Intel Capital Corp. <g>


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News