SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : A.I.M Users Group Bulletin Board -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Bernie Goldberg who wrote (10003)1/15/2000 7:14:00 AM
From: Saul Seinberg  Respond to of 18928
 
Hi Bernie,

I do my UOPIX with Profunds. I prefer Profunds because you can call in a trade with them later in the day than with any broker I'm aware of. In addition, once you are in their queue prior to the Profunds cut-off time, you can hold on and they will take your trade regardless of what time it is when they reach you (or at least that's the way it used to be).

With a discount broker, you can switch the cash from sales of UOPIX to something better than a mere money market, but that has its downside as well. For example, if you have to switch out of the bond fund where you parked money too often or before a minimum period has expired, the broker could impose penalties or, in the case of a closed end fund, you pay commissions. In addition, if there is a mismatch in settlement dates, you may have to put up additional money to support the trade. Finally, the relatively small increase in income over a money market obtained by switching from UOPIX into a short or intermediate term bond fund at a broker is not as much as what I've saved by making a timely trade or two directly with Profunds.

On balance, I therefore prefer to trade with Profunds, but that's my bias and rationale. Others may find that a discount broker suits them better, especially if the broker permits a lower minimum account balance than Profunds. Now, if Tom can talk Profunds into allowing GTC orders, we wouldn't even be having this conversation <g>.

Hope that helps.

SAS... (mile.high.foothills.com)