Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Gold Price Monitor -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Ken Benes who wrote (47078)	1/14/2000 3:56:00 PM
From: Enigma	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 116779

"They are facing both a shareholder revolt and pressure from the bankers to lease gold" Untrue on both counts of course. I wonder if you know what a shareholder revolt is - really? Barrick does not have one- nor can you produce any evidence whatsoever to verify the second point. That is exactly what I mean by rhetoric -talk is cheap - if you lie often enough you will convince yourself at least. As for Terry Swift - on another thread he pointed to Barrick as a 'predator'! I wonder if the shareholders of AQP, Sutton, Lac would agree - I've seen it suggested that Barrick over-paid for some of these companies. There is no doubt that Barrick is interested in Barrick - but one can say that for most companies. All of this airy fairy stuff suggests that business is some sort of charitable enterprise.