SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Interdigital Communication(IDCC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Bill Dalglish who wrote (3390)1/14/2000 6:38:00 PM
From: Manx  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 5195
 
Thank you Bill. And, thank you Corpgold (=Darrell Smith).
Bill, please, do not be a stranger. Any information or analysis can serve a positive role here. sometimes there are too much noise and not much signal here. Of course, I am hoping that the IDC's technology...standards, patents...future chips...will reduce the noise to its minimum level and will increase the signal to its maximum level.

Kind regards,
ManX



To: Bill Dalglish who wrote (3390)1/14/2000 7:18:00 PM
From: Ramsey Su  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 5195
 
There seems to be a lot of disagreement about the IDC story. I just wonder if anyone has requested the company to make a public statement to clarify some of the issues?

While the value of the patents may be somewhat ambiguous, royalty stream, from what sources, for what product, over what time frame, should be very easy to answer.

Right now, I have to say neither the pros nor the cons have stated credable facts. If the company will respond to the Smith v Green arguements, then the confusion would be over. The stock can then take off to what ever it is worth or drop to zero. If the company refuses to respond, then I would suggest they better give a good reason.

Jim Lurgio, Bill Dalglish, you guys must have some direct contact with the company. Why don't you ask them?

I for one am curious as to what is the truth behind IDC.

Ramsey