Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : The Critical Investing Workshop -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Voltaire who wrote (663)	1/14/2000 7:33:00 PM
From: w molloy	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 35685

>> What makes the Q so ambiguous? Obviously - the media's (and to a large degree, the street's) perception of QCOM is ambiguous, but why would that matter one way or the other to the savvy investor? Look at the relative lack of action on the S&P thread, compared to the weeping and gnashing of teeth on your old hangout. 'nuff said w.

To: Voltaire who wrote (663)	1/14/2000 9:30:00 PM
From: JP Sullivan	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 35685

Hi Voltaire, At the... umm... other place, you predicted a pop (to $170+) in Q's price around the time it announces earnings, and thereafter the Houses would come out to push the price down by about 40%. Does this prediction apply to the market as a whole or only to Q? In other words, is February going to be the month that prices on the NASDAQ are going south in a big way? I keep getting this vision of candies and babies :) Might be good to hire a truck or two. Would appreciate a confirmation either way. Winston