Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Ask Michael Burke -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Knighty Tin who wrote (73711)	1/15/2000 1:28:00 AM
From: S. maltophilia	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 132070

Even these folks don't think Intel earned 69 cents: star-telegram.com Is this in your neighborhood?<G>

To: Knighty Tin who wrote (73711)	1/15/2000 9:22:00 AM
From: heraclitus	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 132070

MB Did you miss this special offer??? -ggg- marketwatch.newsalert.com (sorry if posted previously, i can't keep up)

To: Knighty Tin who wrote (73711)	1/15/2000 9:53:00 AM
From: MythMan	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 132070

>> It won't be long before the Ignorati become the Dawson Party. <g> << When, Naz 15K? -g-

To: Knighty Tin who wrote (73711)	1/15/2000 10:52:00 AM
From: Les H	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 132070

They can make more money trading stocks than making computers. Just about every company is announcing an internet venture fund these days. IBM, Oracle, Interprise, etc this week.

To: Knighty Tin who wrote (73711)	1/15/2000 12:08:00 PM
From: Knighty Tin	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 132070

To All, The Intel rally yesterday was truly remarkable. The Naz seems to say it had coattails, but my list of put stocks says otherwise. After early rallies with the Intel scam, most of the tech stocks on my list faded like General MacArthur. The non-techies, like PG and C, kept on truckin'. I have no idea what this means, but it is possible that some smart people used the Intel flim flam to exit some of the other overpriced techies. Or, my list of put names may just be so outstanding that it bucked the trend by fading. <g> Nah, it can't be that last thing.