Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Strategy for Achieving Wealth and Off Topic -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Sonny McWilliams who wrote (25235)	1/16/2000 4:12:00 PM
From: Yaacov	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 27012

Hi Sonny, Thanks for your post. Very good reading, and made lots of sense. Indeed you have a point about Mr. AG. Maybe it was time for him to retire, maybe he is too old! I like the man myself and I have made a lots of money during his years as the head of the Fed. Reserve. But I am afraid that he could screw thing up by tightening the rates, and bringing about a crash. Today I shared your article with a respectable economist at the University of Milan. He told me that if the Feds don't let go with the tight control over the economy, the can do great damage not only to the US economy, but alos to grouth in Europe. And that is not good for the stock marekt, here or in the US. The gneral belief is the Feds. will raise the rate 1/2 percent in one go or .25 percent twice in 2000. This will force the EC to raise the rates and will send Europe in a recession. Simple as that. Now when you read INTC of CPQ threads you hear smart guys that can tell you all about Merced, but ignore the fact that Nerced will not be shipped in great quantities if we have a slow down. Maybe this is the reason that Feds must cool it, isntead of over-controling the economy! Kind regards, yaacov