Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : MARKET INDEX TECHNICAL ANALYSIS - MITA -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: fut_trade who wrote (2339)	1/15/2000 11:14:00 AM
From: marginmike	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 19219

To 10% and by the end of the year if you ignored the crash you would have been ahead of where youve been What is your point?

To: fut_trade who wrote (2339)	1/15/2000 11:49:00 AM
From: TWICK	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 19219

Don't mean to down play the 87 crash, but in the big picture, to me at least, when I compare the effects and aftermath of the 1929 crash, it's but a scratch. Twick

To: fut_trade who wrote (2339)	1/15/2000 11:12:00 PM
From: Dwight E. Karlsen	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 19219

Peter, I wasn't implying that I thought you were short MSFT and/or INTC. I did assume you may be short an index, since you said to J.T.: "SPX Breadth (yesterday at end of day) improved a little, but not convincingly. Same for NDX. I'm short now because I don't see much upside. I have no opinion on downside, but it could be significant." My mention of MSFT reporting Tuesday was a simple heads-up, which you of course may discard as you see fit. But bellweathers such as INTC and MSFT often lead other stocks up on their strength. I believe that INTC upside earnings surprise was the major reason why on Friday, even though bond yields went up, all major indices went up even more. But I guess I already said that before.