Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : The Critical Investing Workshop -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Jim Willie CB who wrote (721)	1/15/2000 12:00:00 PM
From: stantheman	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 35685

JW- I caught the end of the CNBC interview last night. The guy's last name started with Hy......? Very intriguing idea, the bifurcation and lowering of PE's of old school stocks! Is he correct in assuming that our Telecosmic companies have, in general, less dependence on borrowed $$ than other non-tech companies? This sounds a little goofy to me. If this uncovers the lack of depth of my understanding of matters financial, then so be it! thanks- Stan

To: Jim Willie CB who wrote (721)	1/15/2000 7:24:00 PM
From: R.V.M.	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 35685

JW, I've wondered for some time now why the Fed would do their best to slap down the few stocks in this market that are going somewhere. Agree completely...it will only damage the Cokes et al and artifically inflate the high-flyers. Maybe it's my small brain, but can't understand their thinking. Speaking of which, what's a private bank doing setting monetary policy for the country, anyway? At least put somebody like Gilder on the board, who has some sense of the changing economy, and that it needs to be left alone. RVM