SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : InfoSpace (INSP): Where GNET went! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: brk who wrote (16030)1/16/2000 1:54:00 PM
From: Pareto  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 28311
 
My guess is 17 cents

With all the info available on SI it is still difficult to get the important data.
My main problem is that all official data include the merger cost, amortization
of intangibles and the costs related to the preferred stock deal with Vulcan Ventures.
So an analyst or investment manager of an institution is seeing red ink if he goes
through the data.

The company financials of GNET on SI show a loss of US 6,50 per share for 1999.

The profits reported next week will be pro forma, but none of the SI data sources
show that kind of data.

My guess of pro forma earnings, assuming this is the way to calculate it....
(data for last quarters from SEC annual report)

Fiscal 2000 FISCAL 1999 QUARTER ENDED
Estimation ----------------------------
DEC. 31 SEPT. 30 JUN. 30
------------- ----------- -------------
Revenue................. $+13,000,000 $ 9,783,748 $ 5,726,004

Cost of revenue......... - 2,300,000 1,772,125 1,205,310

Gross Profit............ +10,700,000 8,011,623 4,520,694

Operating expenses:
Sales and marketing... - 3,800,000 2,729,322 1,481,248
General and
administrative...... - 3,000,000 2,370,730 1,751,192
Product development... - 2,000,000 1,251,470 634,711

Pro forma Operat. income + 1,900,000

Interest income......... + 3,400,000 3,659,440 2,422,248

PRO FORMA RESULT*** + 5,300,000

Shares outstanding 30,330,000

Per share 0.17

*** may be someone can correct me if I left out elements that should be included
into the pro forma calculation.

Regards,
Pareto



To: brk who wrote (16030)1/16/2000 6:21:00 PM
From: brk  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 28311
 
jz +.12,(after looking into the light) +.19,
(upon further review) +.13
Greg S. +.13
Carolyn F. +.14
Robert Frisbee +.14
brk +.15
Susan G + .15
pareto + .17
elisa7777 +.17
Steve M. +.18
atskaggs +.19
Jack Barker +.19
Al's Fun +.20
Junior Balloon +.20
Edalv +.21
bruiser +.25
Cheeky Kid +.69