SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : 50% Gains Investing -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Dale Baker who wrote (14596)1/15/2000 8:21:00 PM
From: Steve SmithRead Replies (1) | Respond to of 118717
 
Thanks Dale for your kind hospitality.

BTW...do you remember this comment regarding GMGC on Jan. 6, 2000?

<<GMGC looks explosive on the chart. This one could move like GWRX.
I'm in @ 5 13/16.>>

techstocks.com

I just found out that someone on CNBC made these comments on Friday.

<<GMGC was just mentioned on CNBC by Tom Wright of Dorsey Wright saying the chart looked great and this company is working with GM bringing Internet to cars. Gave the stock a good quick pop. >>

Message 12572352

Nice huh? Hmmm...it's always nice to be early before the herds/market.

I hope you bought some HWYM. I don't want to see you pay 5 or higher like you did with AILP. I mentioned AILP at 3s several times here.

Remember..all newsletters buy in a stock first before they come out with a buy recommendation, like AILP and BITS. I mentioned BITS here at 3 and Jenna recommended it to her subscribers at 5-6.

I wouldn't be surprised if HWYM gets recommended sometime this year. By then, it may be a little higher.

take care,
steve



To: Dale Baker who wrote (14596)1/16/2000 12:46:00 AM
From: Steve SmithRespond to of 118717
 
Dale,

Looks like A@P recommended PNJA @ 22-24 to his members. So that's where all the volume came from...

Message 12577422

I feel good being early again. <g>

steve



To: Dale Baker who wrote (14596)1/16/2000 3:15:00 AM
From: B TateRead Replies (2) | Respond to of 118717
 
Dale
re. IARC you might want to check the following:

Message 12583826