SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : ASK Vendit Off Topic Questions -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Jenne who wrote (6749)1/16/2000 3:25:00 PM
From: avanti77  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 19374
 
Ok. Thanks for clearing that up. I guess I've just been surprised by how many people who have been long on Q have been worried at all. Maybe latecomers who got in when it was 600+ are concerned with margin. That's not my case. When I look at the chart on Q, I see a stock that's had a fantastic run, trying to create a new base, and basically doing a decent job of hanging around the 10 day moving average. I think of this as a healthy breather, and feel somewhat puzzled that the Q thread is in disarray, and posters are getting downright nasty with one another. Maybe the panic has do with Jan. options expiration. I suspect a lot of traders played otm Jan. calls when Q was too expensive to buy, and now are caught in a tough place - which is exactly where the mm's want them.

MHO, I think Q trades in a 135-150 range until options expire, and then moves up another 10-20 points into earnings, then bases between 150-175 through February. All bets are off if Q announces any big, new subscribers to CDMA - in which case we go up again. I personally would feel very comfortable if we can get 20 candlesticks in this range, and then have a strong base to go up from, and to hold as support. (I hope I didn't offend you with my question). Glad to hear you're long, although if you were short I had no judgement - just prefer if people state their position publicly.

Donna