SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Scumbria who wrote (87597)1/17/2000 1:41:00 AM
From: Charles R  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1572675
 
Scumbria,

<Is 800 MHz faster than AMD's top speed of 300 MHz, as reported by the local process expert?>

Based on the bizarro logic I see from some of the Intel longs on this thread 300 > 800 - beyond a shadow of doubt. (ask Paul: he buys large amount of AMD and accuses some other suckers of running AMD up)

So, using that logic, I can unequivocally say that Athlon 800MHz is NOT faster than AMD's top speed of 300MHz.

Not at all.

Chuck



To: Scumbria who wrote (87597)1/17/2000 1:50:00 AM
From: Mani1  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1572675
 
Scumbria Re <<Is 800 MHz faster than AMD's top speed of 300 MHz, as reported by the local process expert?>>

Is that expert the author of these posts?

Message 11095546
siliconinvestor.com

Or perhaps this one give the whole thing more justice.

Message 11445732

I wonder what happened to him, Hmmmmm

Mani


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News