SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Let's Talk About Our Feelings!!! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Constant Reader who wrote (72403)1/17/2000 1:31:00 PM
From: Lizzie Tudor  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 108807
 
I doubt very seriously that anybody under 35 reading this agrees with you. I can assure you I am NOT ignorant of the facts as you claim.

I asked you to refute two of my points which I consider key - 1) the elderly are the wealthiest demographic group and 2) the fact that they paid little into the system, while the gen-xers are sinking under the tax burden to support this system.

Those two issues, alone, are cause for revamping the system in its entirety and cutting their benefits drastically - and I doubt you'll find too many people willing to argue about that except the over 50s who are the majority on this thread and other coffee shop threads.

Honestly if I were the elderly I'd make at least a few sacrifices now before the younger demographic reaches critical mass and cuts them off entirely. They should have raised the retirement age to 75 10+ years ago.



To: Constant Reader who wrote (72403)1/17/2000 1:33:00 PM
From: Bill  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 108807
 
No, she's not ignorant, just opinionated about the fairness of the system. She sees a disparity in what people pay in and get out of the system, a legitimate issue for people who will not be rich enough to retire on their own accumulated wealth.