SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : The Thread Formerly Known as No Rest For The Wicked -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: thebeach who wrote (86754)1/17/2000 3:33:00 PM
From: Zoro  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 90042
 
Beach: The filing was made public prior to the spike on Friday, and my guess is the filing is a non issue. The cancellation of the cpq contract was long ago discounted. This is purely an accounting issue relative to that cancellation.



To: thebeach who wrote (86754)1/17/2000 3:37:00 PM
From: macduff3  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 90042
 
While not accessible it was discussed in a post on this thread earlier in the day or over the weekend. Based on my read of that post (being a long-term holder) I viewed it as a non-issue.



To: thebeach who wrote (86754)1/17/2000 5:26:00 PM
From: R.E.B.  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 90042
 
Beach, how can you read "negative" into a story that you have not read??? For all you know, the $38 million that we are supposed to get from CPQ was a low number and $58 million is more like it!!! CS may have to restate earnings HIGHER!!! I don't see anything negative in the article posted. Just because the word "accounting" is mentioned is not always bad.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News