Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Let's Talk About Our Feelings!!! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Lizzie Tudor who wrote (72447)	1/17/2000 4:04:00 PM
From: greenspirit	Respond to of 108807

Lizzie, here's some interesting articles. Boomers and GenX's get bad deal from Social Security. links.http://www.heritage.org/news/pr050597.html heritage.org Note: Both Democrats running for President are against privatizing the SS System. The reform busters. heritage.org Sorry State of Social Security. heritage.org heritage.org Michael

To: Lizzie Tudor who wrote (72447)	1/17/2000 6:51:00 PM
From: Ish	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 108807

<<I have worked for $0. in the past (because I was compensated in stock) - I am NOT poor. >> Wall jeez Vern, you didn't work for $0 then. <<Someone who owns a 500K house has no business collecting welfare from a worker with a higher income... just ask the parties to change places, see who is willing to do so.>> First off the 300k home is California standards, they probably bought it for a song. $500k was their net worth. Trade places? Glad to. I have a farm appraised at a million bucks. Netted $17k last year. You claim over $100k income last year. I'll give you the farm and you give me $100k a year. Sound good to you? I hope. Makes your net worth jump by a million. Net worth and income are two different species. One you have and one you live on.