Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

discover

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Paul Engel who wrote (87741)	1/17/2000 5:53:00 PM
From: steve harris	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1572246

pAUL, You continue to violate the terms of use. siliconinvestor.com g) Posting improper or off-topic messages or posting more than twenty messages in six hours. h) Violating the letter or spirit of the Terms of Use. Recent posts by Paul Engel Subject: Intel Reply #96570, Date: Jan 17 2000 5:45PM Tony - Re: ". Makes one wonder about compatibility, data integrity, cost. Lots... Subject: Intel Reply #96569, Date: Jan 17 2000 5:42PM SCUMbria - Re: "In the last issue of Microprocessor Report, AMD was described... Subject: Advanced Micro Devices Reply #87744, Date: Jan 17 2000 5:38PM SCUMbria - Re: "Heck, they could spend their money on something useful like po... Subject: Advanced Micro Devices Reply #87742, Date: Jan 17 2000 5:36PM Burt - Re: "that "Blow'd Up" add is one of the funniest in years. Loved it." ... Subject: Advanced Micro Devices Reply #87741, Date: Jan 17 2000 5:32PM Stevie Blunder - Re: "y'all may want to contact your buddies at SI, ... Subject: Advanced Micro Devices Reply #87736, Date: Jan 17 2000 5:17PM PT Barnum - Re: "Friess & Associates runs two mutual funds (Brandywine and Bra... Subject: Advanced Micro Devices Reply #87733, Date: Jan 17 2000 5:08PM Really Bad Nus - Re: "albert was a ravid AMD fan who used to teach school at A... Subject: Advanced Micro Devices Reply #87730, Date: Jan 17 2000 4:56PM SCUMbria - Re: "This is not in response to AMD, rather it is an attack on AMD.... Subject: Advanced Micro Devices Reply #87729, Date: Jan 17 2000 4:55PM SCUMbria - Re: "Isn't it interesting that during the one quarter where Intel w... Subject: Advanced Micro Devices Reply #87726, Date: Jan 17 2000 4:45PM PB - Re: "Why didn't AMD foresee that there would be this much demand for the... Subject: Advanced Micro Devices Reply #87725, Date: Jan 17 2000 4:40PM Goutama - Re: "According to this PC Week Taiwan report , Athlon 500 Mhz has be... Subject: Advanced Micro Devices Reply #87713, Date: Jan 17 2000 4:08PM AlibiDan - Re: "the problem for AMD was that they had to sit on and downbin so... Subject: Advanced Micro Devices Reply #87707, Date: Jan 17 2000 4:00PM Citidude - Re: "BTW: Here in Downtown Chicago, Comp USA has an ad in the Sunda... Subject: Advanced Micro Devices Reply #87695, Date: Jan 17 2000 3:33PM SpryGuy - Re: "Six months later, now that the PWeeIII is gasping in what might... Subject: Intel Reply #96555, Date: Jan 17 2000 3:28PM SCUMbria - Re: "Apparently AMD has MDR bamboozled" ... Subject: Intel Reply #96554, Date: Jan 17 2000 3:24PM SCUMbria - Re: "Who wants the low end market? Let VIA have it!" ... Subject: Advanced Micro Devices Reply #87691, Date: Jan 17 2000 3:22PM Bad Nus - Re: "what do you thing accounts for the somewhat stagnating earnings... Subject: Intel Reply #96547, Date: Jan 17 2000 3:10PM SCUMbria - Re: "I did. In a moment of weakness I let myself believe that AMD c... Subject: Intel Reply #96544, Date: Jan 17 2000 3:03PM Ten - Re: "That "bombast" was nothing more than the press inflating anti-Merce... Subject: Intel Reply #96542, Date: Jan 17 2000 3:00PM SCUMbria - Re: "Manufacturing at IBM has been the downfall of many companies.... Subject: Advanced Micro Devices Reply #87685, Date: Jan 17 2000 2:58PM Gary - Re: 'Remind me about Jimmy who sold his large portfolio of INTC at 76 a... Subject: Advanced Micro Devices Reply #87682, Date: Jan 17 2000 2:56PM SpryGuy - Re: " .PWeeIII 733 repeated and incredibly expensive (in terms of bo... Subject: Advanced Micro Devices Reply #87678, Date: Jan 17 2000 2:45PM Petz - Re: "Engel, show me another reputable company (not INTEL) with capital... Subject: Advanced Micro Devices Reply #87675, Date: Jan 17 2000 2:38PM PT BArnum - Re: "I believe this SEC filing may have been prompted by their acc... Subject: Advanced Micro Devices Reply #87673, Date: Jan 17 2000 2:37PM Chuckles - Re: "May be they were following "some" of your/Ashok's comments ins... Subject: Advanced Micro Devices Reply #87672, Date: Jan 17 2000 2:36PM Chuckles - Re: "You go around preaching people how bad an investment AMD is" ... Subject: Advanced Micro Devices Reply #87670, Date: Jan 17 2000 2:30PM Chuckles - Re: "My guess is AMD will do 1G in April thought it looks like they... Subject: Advanced Micro Devices Reply #87669, Date: Jan 17 2000 2:27PM AlibiDan - Re: "I've been buy and hold since end of July - don't generalize so... Subject: Intel Reply #96537, Date: Jan 17 2000 2:21PM John - Re: "Last week, the Financial Times reported that Transmeta has signed... Subject: Intel Reply #96535, Date: Jan 17 2000 2:06PM Tony - Re: ". It's a real architected system, although it does borrow from a l...

Copyright/IP Policy

Advertise on SI

© 2025 Knight Sac Media. Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News