SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Paul Engel who wrote (87790)1/17/2000 9:17:00 PM
From: brushwud  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1572753
 
AMD spent $300,000,000 or $400,000,000 to buy Monolithic Memories in the FIRST PLACE - back in 1987!

There you go again--looking backward--as you were saying in post #87396. You could write a book, I'm sure. (Why don't you?)

How much growth do you expect in INTC in Y2K? Any more than 3%?



To: Paul Engel who wrote (87790)1/18/2000 12:08:00 AM
From: Cirruslvr  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1572753
 
Paul - RE: "AMD spent $300,000,000 or $400,000,000 to buy Monolithic Memories in the FIRST PLACE - back in 1987!"

Can you please give a brief history lesson about this?

Thanks.



To: Paul Engel who wrote (87790)1/18/2000 1:27:00 AM
From: Petz  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1572753
 
Paul, re:<How could AMD make [$432M on the sale of Monolithic Memories when they] spent $300,000,000 or $400,000,000 to buy Monolithic Memories in the FIRST PLACE - back in 1987!>

The joys of accounting! And every year since 1987, AMD has been reducing earning by a little bit to account for the acquisition! Exactly what Intel will be doing in their 10Q quarterly reports to the SEC, but NOT DOING in their press releases to Wall Street (except in a footnote).

The fact that AMD was writing off MMI every year since 1987 does not mean it was not profitable, but these profits were reduced by the writeoff amount. By time Vantis was sold, its book value was near zero.

Petz