SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Process Boy who wrote (87846)1/18/2000 1:11:00 AM
From: Goutam  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1574500
 
PB,

   _______ multichannel.com ______

GI Must Recall Boxes

New York -- Motorola Inc.'s newly acquired
General Instrument Corp. unit has had to
recall at least 37,000 of its popular "DCT-2000"
digital set-tops because of a defective
component that made them inoperable, cable
sources said.

The boxes in question were shipped to cable
operators in recent weeks, and they were
manufactured in the fourth quarter of last year,
Motorola senior vice president David Robinson
has confirmed.

GI has the identification numbers of the faulty
boxes, and earlier this month it began notifying
cable operators that had received them about the
problem.

The notice said the boxes "are not able to be
fielded due to a performance issue with the Intel
[Corp.] flash component" and, as a result, "they
will not be able to properly receive code
downloads."


GI said the boxes had to come back for a
"memory performance upgrade," one operator
source said, reading from the notice.

- 1/14/00
__________________________________________________

Ooops....

Goutama
(Credits to: HighlyInterested - Yahoo AMD message board)



To: Process Boy who wrote (87846)1/18/2000 1:41:00 AM
From: Scumbria  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1574500
 
PB,

x86 code is usually optimized for Intel processors. Nothing sinister, but it makes Intel hardware look faster than it really is relative to AMD hardware.

Scumbria




To: Process Boy who wrote (87846)1/18/2000 1:07:00 PM
From: Charles R  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1574500
 
PB,

<800MHz >

I should say you guys have come through phenomenally on the process side - better than I thought you would. Kudos.

By the way, do you think W* will get to 1G by the 24th? Have you bet on it yet?

<Dr. Yu>

The amount of contempt that is being shown towards Dr. Yu is pretty phenomenal - and from what I gather it is being done very OPENLY even inside Intel.

Chuck