SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : DISCUSSION OF DOCTRINE of CHRISTIAN CHURCHES -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: average joe who wrote (186)1/18/2000 8:02:00 PM
From: Colleen M  Respond to of 454
 
average joe, I don't know why you sent this message to me. I don't think it has anything to do with Doctrine of Christian Churches.



To: average joe who wrote (186)1/18/2000 9:15:00 PM
From: PROLIFE  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 454
 
Do you feel somewhat bigger to have posted that or do you have to strap it on?

Why don't you discontinue these attacks against everyone?

"Discipline yourselves, keep alert. Like a roaring lion your adversary the devil prowls around, looking for someone to devour."

Why are you here?

dan



To: average joe who wrote (186)1/18/2000 9:57:00 PM
From: Tom Clarke  Respond to of 454
 
Joe, I don't understand why you're bringing up things that Colleen posted in anger. After a couple of angry posts, Collen and lorrie made nice and had a nice little chat. It wasn't a big deal.

Your motivations on this are perplexing.



To: average joe who wrote (186)1/19/2000 12:51:00 AM
From: haqihana  Respond to of 454
 

To: C Kahn who wrote (63422)
From: haqihana Wednesday, Jan 19, 2000 12:43 AM ET
Reply # of 64992

aj, you are digging up old posts that have, long since, been settled, and forgotten by everyone else but you. You made no comment at the time these posts were made, so why are you dredging them up now? I know why. You are so desperate to find something to criticize someone with, that you have to resort to past history. Another indication that you are devoid of original thought processes. --haqi

Somehow, I responded to your link instead of your post. -haqi