SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Rambus (RMBS) - Eagle or Penguin -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Don Green who wrote (36637)1/18/2000 9:47:00 PM
From: Don Green  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 93625
 
In an action that could affect the entire memory chip industry, embattled memory chip designer, Rambus (RMBS:Nasdaq - news) went on the offensive Tuesday, by suing memory maker Hitachi for patent infringement. Filed in Federal District Court in Delaware, the suit seeks to stop Hitachi from making or selling a variety of its synchronous-DRAM chips. These include not only next generation double data rate DRAM, which has been seen as an alternative to Rambus, but PC100 SDRAM, which is the most common type of PC memory chip sold today.

Rambus announced the suit shortly after Intel (INTC:Nasdaq - news) announced it had joined with memory makers Hyundai Electronics, Infineon Technologies, Micron Technology (MU:NYSE - news), NEC and Samsung in a new consortium to develop advanced memory technology, which may not include Rambus in future designs.

The news pulled shares of Rambus down 7% Tuesday to close at 83 5/16. Rambus has become a cult stock among both individual investors and short sellers: Of the 23.80 million shares of Rambus outstanding, 37% are shorted -- that's 48% of the company's 18.60 million share float.

Chip analyst Seth Dickson of Warburg Dillon Read predicts that investors will applaud Rambus's aggressive action. "There will be more short covering than long buying, because its an offensive on the part of Rambus and says that clearly they have legitimate technology that is being used today." (Dillon Read is not an underwriter of Rambus.)

Avo Kanadjian, vice president of worldwide marketing for Rambus, says his company is currently negotiating with other memory makers over infringement issues, although he declined to name names. It decided to sue Hitachi only after that company broke off negotiations. He says Rambus expects to reach amicable settlements with all the companies.

Rambus CEO Geoff Tate first acknowledged that alternative SDRAM technology might infringe Rambus patents during an interview with TSC in August. "Every Rambus DRAM is basically a double-data-rate part," he said at the time. "We transfer data on both edges of the clock and we were the first to do so."

But industry watchers laughed at the notion. Rambus doesn't manufacture or sell its own products, but depends on memory makers adopting its designs and paying royalties for it. Kanadjian says Rambus has no choice. "We carefully evaluated our options but at the end of the day Rambus is in the [intellectual property] business and we have to protect our IP," he says.

Spokespersons for Hitachi and Micron would not comment for this story.

-- Marcy Burstiner