Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Murder Mystery: Who Killed Yale Student Suzanne Jovin? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Jeffrey S. Mitchell who wrote (354)	1/19/2000 10:59:00 AM
From: CJ	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1397

<Re: CT autopsy reports... the definitive answer> Thank you for your search of the net. You continue to be a tremendous source of information and assistance to this thread. (24) Based on Harry Simpson's post of how the autopsy report provision is being interpreted by the ME's Office, it would make sense for you to follow-through with the telephone call. Additionally, upon reading the remainder of the the FAQ's, if you do not already have a copy of the Certificate of Death, please obtain one. Significant to our mission, it will show the cause of death and time of death. I will continue along this line in my next post. ===========================>

To: Jeffrey S. Mitchell who wrote (354)	1/19/2000 11:20:00 AM
From: CJ	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1397

To the Thread: Our investigation has reached a point in which we {through Jeff) will likely obtain part of the autopsy (and toxicology?) report(s) and the Certificate of Death. . In sensitivity to the memory of Suzanne Jovin, and to the Jovin family, IMO, any part of the autopsy report that may be obtained and the Certificate of Death should NOT be scanned and posted on the thread. Although doing so is not quite the same as posting them on the www, to me, it is not proper. In the alternative, if the participants in this investigation are in agreement, Jeff will fax or email them to me and we will review them. If there is anything that we feel needs interpreting, I will contact a pathologist I know to supply the answers. The pertinent information for us -- for example, forensics regarding the wounds, cause of death, time of death, and the like -- will then be posted by Jeff (or me if he he has any reluctance to do so). As an partial alternative, a few of us have noted that Jim Barrett appears to have some medical knowledge. If that is the case, it would be fine with me for Jim to stand in my proposed stead. . Am I being overly sensitive? I leave it to the rest of you to decide. . Thank you.